President Shavingsweetstrippedsuperheroine En Podporte Nas T961 Cunt Nekkid Tresa is a dumb censoring cunt-w/GRATUITOUS NUDITY - Behind Blue Eyes - Open Salon -

And I also pointed out that race and gender are protected classes, not political parties to buckeye who seemed to think giving candy out fell under constitutional protection

Oh, SURE I thought candy distribution was in the Constitution. I'm also sure you took me that way and weren't just trying to be a sarcastic condescending pompous ass.

My point was that it is unacceptable for this woman to have such stipulations about who gets candy and that she deserves all the ridicule she gets. She's doing nothing illegal, but she's no better than someone who would only give candy to white kids or Christians. Clearly, her behavior is socially unacceptable, or else we would never have even heard of her. Thus, why you would defend her is beyond me, other than the fact that you LOVE to take the opposite position, common sense be damned.

I defend her because no one has a right to their neighbor's candy.

Sure you do.

I'm all confused about what side I'm on. I was upset by the No Troll Zone - but then in your post you're anti-TWAT. I'm a proud TWAT member...

You're only a Troll to the holierthanthou Tresa if yu disagree with him. He has not problem jumping on Americin's ugly, anti everything rural rant

Troll - don't worry about sides. Treas called me out on his blog and I am merely responding. Unlike Tresa, I call people out by name.

Walker, good point. Tresa is also a hypocrite.

To those writing me all afraid this post will get me banned:

Thanks for the concerns, but I have seen the word cunt in other post's titles here before and I have also seen other blogger's names in plenty of post as well.

My comment on Tresa's blog was on point, contributed to the conversation as other people responded to it in the comment thread, and was only deleted because Tresa is a pompous blow hard who can't stand it when he is not fawned over.

The problem seems to be that you are making a valid point along with calling fellow people commenting as "dumb asses." While I don't think I would have deleted your comment if it was on my blog, I can understand why someone would have judged that as unnecessarily uncivil and worth deletion.

Indeed, I have left all of your mean-spirited and not-always-on-topic comments on my blog, but I wouldn't begrudge someone for deciding differently.

Posting here that certain people are "a complete balless loser" or "in the perpetual twat club" or "a stupid cunt" even if in the British tradition as opposed to the American tradition doesn't help your case.

It's not unreasonable to expect participants in our blog not to resort to nasty name calling.

I can't understand nor defend deleting others' comments.

But to take a great moral stand against censorship, you might want to follow Tresa and Bailey's lead and actually use your real name.

Surely you have legitimate reasons for hiding behind blue eyes, but by doing so, you soften your (appreciated) crusading punch--at least in my view.

Skeptic, you are in the false politeness club. I am in the call it like I see it club. It is a stylistic difference.

I can back up every insult. Tresa is a censoring pig who deletes those who do not agree with him and so is Bailey the presumptuous twat. This is not the first time they have deleted me. I have deliberately written profanity free comments on both their blogs in the past only to have them deleted because I dare to disagree.

I saved some of those and can post them here.

So why should I bother to keep it profanity free? I know up front that both of those blow hards are going to delete anything I write.

Alverson, the internet is forever and I am not stupid. I know what I write here is not very popular and don't need OS people setting the campaign signs on my lawn on fire or publishing my address.

You had a close brush with how the internet can intrude on real life not so long ago.